Lately I've become a bit disenchanted with blogging.
When I first started my blog, more than two years ago, I used it as a substitution for the photographs and stories I'd been emailing out to my family. It was intended to be literally "the chronicle of Abigail." Gradually, it started to morph into a mix of photographic essays about what Abigail was doing, a forum for me to discuss my own personal thoughts and reflections on various topics, or the tale of what our entire family was up to.
I was pleasantly surprised to reconnect with many old friends through blogging, and I made lots of new ones. I loved reading about what everyone else was doing, and I got lots of fabulous ideas and tips from reading blogs. As I read more of what other people were writing, my entries started to be designed more to entertain...and to evoke comments. Most of you probably know the thrill of comments; it's exciting to check your email and have twenty people telling you how much they enjoyed your post and how funny it was and how they identified with x.
Lately I've been struggling with the dichotomy of writing what I really want to write about (stories from my day, what the girls are up to) and the kinds of posts that I know will get lots of comments. I don't like this feeling, and I don't like how I get a bit depressed when I write a post that I think was really great and there are only one or two comments on it. Since I can look at my stats and see how many people are subscribed to my blog via Google Reader, it's doubly depressing because I think,"Wow...forty people read this today, and they must have all thought it was dumb." I know that's not true, and I know I rarely comment on most of the blogs I read, just because I don't have time, but this is why I'm going to be turning off my comments (at first I thought I might just quit blogging and just go back to
journaling privately) because I want to be writing for me and for what I want to write about, and not worrying so much about whether or not someone takes the time to comment.
I know that many of you have used the comments function in the past to ask me various questions--if a post inspires such a question, you can reach me at
theirchronicles@gmail.com, which will also be posted in the sidebar from now on. And from time to time, I'll probably turn the comments back on temporarily.
Meanwhile, as sort of a last commenting hurrah, I'd love to know what magazines you read or subscribe to. We're to the point in the year where most of my subscriptions are ending, and I'm thinking about dropping some and checking out some new magazines. So what ones do you really like? Which always get read right away, which do you save, and which go in the trash as soon as you're done?
To start off the discussion, here's what I'm getting right now:
The Ensign, Martha Stewart Living, Bon Appetit, Domino, Family Handyman, Reader's Digest, and
Parents. Others that I've subscribed to in the past and really liked are
US News and
The Atlantic Monthly. When I'm at my parents' house I always catch up with their
National Geographics and
The Economist (no, Mom and Dad, I'm not asking for a subscription!), and I also like to check out
Real Simple from the library (and I think I'm going to drop some of the others and get a subscription to that instead, because I find it much more practical than, say,
Domino or
Parents). My grandma often saves her copies of
Gourmet and
Country Living for me and I always like to look through those.
My favorite thing about magazines: if they've got a fairly big text-to-pictures ratio, they're GREAT for the treadmill. My preferred treadmill material is
The Ensign, since it's mostly text (you don't have to turn the page a lot, which is very important when you're running!!). Least favorite is something big and bulky that will fall right off onto your toes. So I read a lot of back issues of the
Ensign. (and if you're thinking about trying this, my experience is that you can read anything at any pace on the elliptical; reading on the treadmill requires more practice. Start off running around 12 minutes a mile and then gradually bump up your pace as your eyes get adjusted to it--through subsequent runs--I can now read comfortably at about 8 minutes a mile and start reading right off without any pace adjustment. It also depends on the length of your stride--I'm 5'7" and I can read just fine while running, but my 6'5" husband's stride results in too much "bouncing" for his eyes to focus. anyway, it makes the running go a LOT faster!)
Comment away! Last chance.